Title The psychological impact of esophageal cancer screening on anxiety and depression in China
Authors Zhu, Juan
Ma, Shanrui
Chen, Ru
Liu, Zhaorui
Liu, Zhengkui
Wei, Wenqiang
Affiliation Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Cent Canc Registry, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Canc Prevent, Canc Hosp, Univ Chinese Acad Sci,Zhejiang Canc Hosp,Inst Canc, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Inst Mental Hlth, Key Lab Mental Hlth, Minist Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Mental Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
Keywords BREAST-CANCER
DIAGNOSIS
PREVALENCE
DISORDERS
MORTALITY
EFFICACY
OUTCOMES
STRESS
DESIGN
RISK
Issue Date 20-Oct-2022
Publisher FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Abstract ObjectiveThe psychological impact of screening is unclear and has been ignored. This study aimed to evaluate the psychological impact of esophageal cancer (EC) screening on anxiety and depression in China. Materials and methodsA multicenter, population-based study in five high-risk regions of EC was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Residents were recruited and underwent endoscopic screening and then were diagnosed with normal, esophagitis, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and EC. Subjects who did not participate in the screening were referred to as the control group. We surveyed their anxiety and depression levels at baseline and after endoscopy and informed them of different pathological results to evaluate the psychological impact of the screening process. ResultsA total of 2,337 subjects completed all surveys in the screening process (normal: 355, esophagitis: 1,713, LGIN: 213, HGIN: 43 and EC: 13), with 63 controls. The levels of anxiety and depression of screeners were significantly higher than those of controls (P < 0.001). The fluctuation of anxiety and depression showed a "V" pattern in the screening process. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms at baseline, after endoscopy and after knowing the pathological results was 5.6, 0.3, and 3.2%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the corresponding prevalence of depression was 3.6, 0.2, and 2.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). With the aggravation of pathological results, the levels of anxiety and depression increased significantly (P < 0.001), especially in patients informed of HGIN (16.3 and 9.3%) and EC (23.1 and 30.8%). ConclusionParticipation in endoscopic screening may bring short-term adverse psychological effects, especially at baseline and knowing the pathological results. More attention should be given to participants waiting for endoscopic screening. The method of informing the screening results of HGIN and EC should be improved. Further precise screening is needed to concentrate on high-risk groups to reduce the psychological impact of screening.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/658154
ISSN 1664-0640
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933678
Indexed SCI(E)
SSCI
Appears in Collections: 第六医院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.