Title Predictive Efficiency of Prediabetes for Diabetes Among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Populations: a 5-Year National Prospective Cohort Study
Authors Sun, Hang
Xu, Lu
Liu, Lili
Zhan, Siyan
Wang, Shengfeng
Song, Yongfeng
Affiliation Shandong Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Endocrinol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
Shandong Clin Med Ctr Endocrinol & Metab, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
Shandong Acad Clin Med, Inst Endocrinol & Metab, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
Peking Univ Third Hosp, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Inst Artificial Intelligence, Ctr Intelligent Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
Shandong Inst Endocrine & Metab Dis, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
Keywords IMPAIRED FASTING GLUCOSE
TYPE-2
PREVALENCE
HEALTH
RISK
EPIDEMIOLOGY
PROGRESSION
OBESITY
ADULTS
CARE
Issue Date Jul-2022
Publisher JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Abstract Background Limited studies have explored the predictive efficiency of prediabetes based on two definitions for diabetes among Chinese middle-aged and older populations with prediabetes. Objective To evaluate the predictive efficiency of prediabetes based on two definitions for diabetes and the clinical and public health benefit in Chinese middle-aged and older populations. Design A 5-year cohort study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Participants A total of 5208 participants who had blood sample data at baseline in 2011. Main Measures The exposure was prediabetes based on American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) definition. The main outcome was incident diabetes. The ability of prediabetes for predicting diabetes was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the associations between prediabetes and the 5-year risk of diabetes and all-cause mortality. Key Results Among those with prediabetes according to the ADA definition, only 426 (15.45%) with baseline prediabetes progressed to total diabetes, while according to the WHO definition, 208 (21.89%) progressed to total diabetes. In terms of the ability of predicting the incident total diabetes in 5 years, the ADA definition has a higher sensitivity than the WHO definition (70.76% versus 34.55%, P < 0.001), while the WHO definition has a higher specificity than the ADA definition (84.09% versus 49.35%, P < 0.001). Positive predictive values based on the two definitions were low (< 24%); negative predictive values were high (> 90%). Conclusions Neither definition of prediabetes is robust for predicting diabetes development in Chineses middle-aged and older populations.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/649043
ISSN 0884-8734
DOI 10.1007/s11606-022-07731-x
Indexed SCI(E)
Appears in Collections: 第三医院
公共卫生学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.