Title Evolution of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy from 2012 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Review
Authors Zhang, Junwei
Yang, Xiaobo
Fang, Jinyu
Cheng, Quan-Cheng
Ding, Hui-Ru
Sun, Yan-Rong
Li, Man
Zhang, Jing-Lin
Zhang, Lei
Zhao, Haitao
Sang, Xinting
Xu, Yi-Yao
Zhang, Wei-Guang
Lu, Xin
Affiliation Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll PUMC Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll CAMS & PUMC, Dept Liver Surg, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Human Anat Histol & Embryol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Shanxi Med Univ Sch, Hosp Stomatol, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
Keywords ALPPS PROCEDURE
GREATER HYPERTROPHY
MORTALITY
REGENERATION
SAFETY
METASTASES
OCCLUSION
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA
EMBOLIZATION
EXPERIENCE
Issue Date Jul-2022
Publisher INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Abstract Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has become increasingly popular during the past few decades, and its indications have extended from patients with normal liver to post-chemotherapy patients and even patients with cirrhosis. However, few studies have assessed the publications in relation to ALPPS. Methods: Web of Science was searched to identify studies related to ALPPS published from 2012 to 2021. The analysis was performed using the bibliometric package (Version 3.1.0) in R software. Results: In total, 486 publications were found. These articles were published in 159 journals and authored by 2157 researchers from 694 organizations. The most prolific journal was Annals of Surgery (24 articles and 1170 citations). The most frequently cited article was published in Annals of Surgery (average citations, 72.7; total citations, 727). China was the most productive country for ALPPS publications but had comparatively less interaction with other countries. Both thematic evolution and co-occurrence network analysis showed low numbers of topics such as failure, resection, and safety among the publications but large numbers of highly cited papers on outcomes, prediction, mechanisms, multicenter analysis, and novel procedures such as liver venous deprivation. A total of 196 studies focused the clinical application of ALPPS, and most studies were IDEAL Stages I and II. The specific mechanism of ALPPS liver regeneration remains unclear. Conclusions: This is the first bibliometric analysis offering an overview of the development of ALPPS research publications. Our findings identified prominent studies, countries, institutions, journals, and authors to indicate the future direction of ALPPS research. The role of ALPPS in liver regeneration and the long-term results of ALPPS need further study. Future research directions include comparison of ALPPS with portal vein embolization, liver venous deprivation, and other two-stage hepatectomies as well as patients' quality of life after ALPPS.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/647584
ISSN 1743-9191
DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106648
Indexed SCI(E)
Appears in Collections: 基础医学院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.