Title Comparison of Upfront Transplantation and Pretransplant Cytoreductive Therapy for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Authors Wang, Hong
Li, Yan
Xu, Qingyu
Zhou, Wei
Yin, Chengliang
Wang, Ruiqi
Wang, Mengzhen
Xu, Yuanyuan
Li, Yonghui
Yu, Li
Affiliation Nankai Univ, Sch Med, Tianjin, Peoples R China
Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Shenzhen Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Hematol & Oncol,Clin Med Acad,Gen Hosp, Int Canc Ctr,Shenzhen Key Lab Precis Med Hematol, Xueyuan AVE 1098, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Third Hosp, Dept Hematol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Mannheim, Germany
Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Innovat Res Div, Med Big Data Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Natl Engn Lab Med Big Data Applicat Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Keywords STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION
INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY
MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY
IDENTICAL SIBLINGS
SOCIETE FRANCAISE
EUROPEAN-SOCIETY
AZACITIDINE
IMPACT
ADULTS
Issue Date Sep-2021
Publisher CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Abstract The value of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy for patients with advanced MDS remains controversial. This retrospective study including 69 cases showed that patients with upfront transplantation achieved outcomes similar to those receiving pretransplant cytoreduction. Achieving remission before transplantation led to better survival. This indicates the value of timely transplantation for advanced MDS and suitable pretransplant therapy during the donor search. Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the value of pretransplant cytoreduction remains debatable. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively compared the outcomes of upfront transplantation and pretransplant cytoreduction. Of 69 patients, 39 received upfront alto-HSCT and 30 received pretransplant cytoreduction, including chemotherapy (n = 16), hypomethylating agents (HMAs, n = 6), and HMAs with chemotherapy (n = 8). Results: The upfront group achieved similar overall survival (OS) and a trend of better progression-free survival (PFS) from diagnosis compared with the cytoreduction group (3-year PFS, 64.0% vs. 44.4%, P = .076). Posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups in terms of OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In patients with >= 2 mutations, the upfront group achieved better OS and PFS (3-year OS, 100.0% vs. 68.6%, P = .044; 3-year PFS: 92.3% vs. 43.9%, P = .016) than the cytoreduction group. Patients achieving remission in the cytoreduction group had outcomes similar to the upfront group, but those without remission before transplantation had a significantly worse posttransplant OS (3-year OS, 46.7% vs. 75.7%, P = .038). Patients with pretransplant HMAs had better PFS than those with chemotherapy or HMAs plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with pretransplant cytoreduction, upfront allo-HSCT might provide more benefit to some patients with advanced MDS if there are suitable donors. HMAs would be a good alternative during the donor search. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/624072
ISSN 2152-2650
DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2021.04.015
Indexed SCI(E)
Appears in Collections: 第三医院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.