Title An analytical study of drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse events among 165 COVID-19 patients
Authors Sun, Feng
Kou, Hao
Wang, Shengfeng
Lu, Yun
Zhao, Houyu
Li, Wenjing
Zhou, Qingxin
Jiang, Qiaoli
Cheng, Yinchu
Yang, Kun
Zhuo, Lin
Xu, Yang
Wu, Dongfang
Zhan, Siyan
Cheng, Hong
Affiliation Wuhan Univ, Dept Pharm, Zhongnan Hosp, 169 Donghu Rd, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
Peking Univ Third Hosp, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
Keywords 2019-NCOV
OUTBREAK
Issue Date Feb-2021
Publisher ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Abstract Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has lasted for nearly 4 months by this study was conducted. We aimed to describe drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse drug events of COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective, single-center case series study enrolled 165 consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were followed up until March 25, 2020, from a designated hospital in Wuhan. Patients were grouped by a baseline degree of severity: non-severe and severe. An analytical study of drug utilization, disease progression, and adverse events (AEs) of COVID-19 was conducted. Results: Of the 165 COVID-19 cases, antivirals, antibacterials, glucocorticoids, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) were administered to 92.7%, 98.8%, 68.5%, and 55.2% of patients, respectively. The total kinds of drugs administered to the severe subgroup [26, interquartile range (IQR) 18-39] were 11 more than the non-severe subgroup (15, IQR 10-24), regardless of comorbidities. The 2 most common combinations of medications in the 165 cases were `antiviral therapy + glucocorticoids + TCM' (81, 49.1%) and `antiviral therapy + glucocorticoids' (23, 13.9%). Compared with non- severe cases, severe cases received more glucocorticoids (88.5% vs. 66.2%, P=0.02), but less TCM (50.0% vs. 63.3%, P=0.20), and suffered a higher percentage of death (34.6% vs. 7.2%, P=0.001). At the end of the follow-up, 130 (78.8%) patients had been discharged, and 24 (14.5%) died. There were 13 patients (7.9%) who had elevated liver enzymes, and 49 patients (29.7%) presented with worsening kidney function during the follow-up. Conclusions: Of the 165 COVID-19 patients, the fatality rate remained high (14.5%). Drug utilization for COVID-19 was diverse and generally complied with the existing guidelines. Combination regimens containing antiviral drugs might be beneficial to assist COVID-19 recovery. Additionally, liver and kidney AEs should not be ignored.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/623689
ISSN 2305-5839
DOI 10.21037/atm-20-4960
Indexed SCI(E)
Appears in Collections: 公共卫生学院
第三医院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.