Title CT-Guided I-125 Seed Interstitial Brachytherapy as a Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Spinal Metastases after External Beam Radiotherapy
Authors Yao, Lihong
Cao, Qianqian
Wang, Junjie
Yang, Jiwen
Meng, Na
Guo, Fuxin
Jiang, Yuliang
Tian, Suqing
Sun, Haitao
Affiliation Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hua Yuan North Rd 49, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China.
Shandong Univ, Ctr Canc, Hosp 2, Jinan 250033, Shandong, Peoples R China.
Wannan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, 2 Zhe Shan Xi Rd, Jinghu Dist 241001, Wuhu, Peoples R China.
Keywords STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY
RADIATION-THERAPY
CORD COMPRESSION
BONE METASTASES
PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY
IMPLANTATION
TUMORS
REIRRADIATION
TOLERANCE
CARCINOMA
Issue Date 2016
Publisher BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Citation BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL.2016.
Abstract The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical efficacy of CT-guided I-125 seed interstitial brachytherapy in patients with recurrent spinal metastases after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Between August 2003 and September 2015, 26 spinal metastatic lesions (24 patients) were reirradiated by this salvage therapy modality. Treatment for all patients was preplanned using a three-dimensional treatment planning system 3-5 days before I-125 seed interstitial brachytherapy; dosimetry verification was performed immediately after seed implantation. Median actual D-90 was 99 Gy (range, 90-176), and spinal cord median D-max was 39 Gy (range, 6-110). Median local control (LC) was 12 months (95% CI: 7.0-17.0). The 6-and 12-month LC rates were 52% and 40%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI: 7.7-14.3); 6- month and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 65%, 37%, 14%, and 9%, respectively. Pain-free survival ranged from 2 to 42 months (median, 6; 95% CI: 4.6-7.4). Treatment was well-tolerated, with no radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures or myelopathy reported. Reirradiation with CT-guided I-125 seed interstitial brachytherapy appears to be feasible, safe, and effective as pain relief or salvage treatment for patients with recurrent spinal metastases after EBRT.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/459064
ISSN 2314-6133
DOI 10.1155/2016/8265907
Indexed SCI(E)
Appears in Collections: 第三医院

Files in This Work
There are no files associated with this item.

Web of Science®


0

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.