Title Assessing leakage detectability at geologic CO2 sequestration sites using the probabilistic collocation method
Authors Sun, Alexander Y.
Zeidouni, Mehdi
Nicot, Jean-Philippe
Lu, Zhiming
Zhang, Dongxiao
Affiliation Univ Texas Austin, Bur Econ Geol, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM USA.
Peking Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
Keywords Carbon sequestration and storage
Leakage detection
Probabilistic collocation method
Detectability
Signal-to-noise ratio
Uncertainty quantification
HETEROGENEOUS POROUS-MEDIA
PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
SOLUTE FLUX APPROACH
DEEP SALINE AQUIFER
RANDOM INPUT DATA
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
POLYNOMIAL CHAOS
ABANDONED WELL
FLOW
TRANSPORT
Issue Date 2013
Publisher 水资源进展
Citation ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES.2013,56,49-60.
Abstract We present an efficient methodology for assessing leakage detectability at geologic carbon sequestration sites under parameter uncertainty. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) and risk assessment are integral and, in many countries, mandatory components of geologic carbon sequestration projects. A primary goal of risk assessment is to evaluate leakage potential from anthropogenic and natural features, which constitute one of the greatest threats to the integrity of carbon sequestration repositories. The backbone of our detectability assessment framework is the probability collocation method (PCM), an efficient, nonintrusive, uncertainty-quantification technique that can enable large-scale stochastic simulations that are based on results from only a small number of forward-model runs. The metric for detectability is expressed through an extended signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which incorporates epistemic uncertainty associated with both reservoir and aquifer parameters. The spatially heterogeneous aquifer hydraulic conductivity is parameterized using Karhunen-Loeve (KL) expansion. Our methodology is demonstrated numerically for generating probability maps of pressure anomalies and for calculating SNRs. Results indicate that the likelihood of detecting anomalies depends on the level of uncertainty and location of monitoring wells. A monitoring well located close to leaky locations may not always yield the strongest signal of leakage when the level of uncertainty is high. Therefore, our results highlight the need for closed-loop site characterization, monitoring network design, and leakage source detection. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/223217
ISSN 0309-1708
DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.017
Indexed SCI(E)
EI
Appears in Collections: 工学院

Web of Science®


59

Checked on Last Week

Scopus®



Checked on Current Time

百度学术™


0

Checked on Current Time

Google Scholar™





License: See PKU IR operational policies.